Over the past year, the Program Performance Review Committee developed an Annual Program Review (APR) process that will be timelier and more meaningful, along with two complementary dashboards. The ...

The University of Connecticut was recently in the news, including in the Chronicle (“Another Public Flagship May Cut Dozens of Majors,” October 17), regarding our ongoing planned review of academic ...

Academic program reviews (not associated with accreditation reviews) are to occur every 8 years according to a published timetable included in this document. Important characteristics of the academic ...

Earlier this month, the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) announced the completion of the RGGI Third Program Review, which resulted in several major changes to the RGGI Model Rule that will ...

Reviews are thorough and require 12-18 months to complete. Brief descriptions of the individual process elements with linked guides and templates are provided below. A complete overview of the process ...

The Program Performance Review Committee developed an Annual Program Review (APR) process that will be timelier and more meaningful, along with two complementary dashboards. The committee was composed ...

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up for any (or all) of our 25+ Newsletters. Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and ...

As programs continually review quantitative and qualitative information related to program outcomes and viability, it is sometimes necessary to phase out an academic program. The formal policies that ...

This content was created by The Chronicle’s editorial team, supported by a grant from Strada Education Foundation. Read our policies on foundation support. S weeping reviews of whether to keep or ...