The Supreme Court ruled Friday that President Trump overstepped his authority in ordering tariffs on nearly everything the U.S. imports. Here's some economic context to understand that decision.

China’s zero tariff regime has the potential to boost trade between African countries and lead to better coordination.

The U.S. can imposed tariffs for a number of legal reasons that are being explored and cited by the administration of Donald Trump. With help from a top international trade lawyer, here is a brief ...

Trump tariffs 2025 impact Americans: A Federal Reserve Bank of New York study challenges claims that foreign countries bore the cost of President Trump's 2025 tariffs. The report found that American ...

Add Yahoo as a preferred source to see more of our stories on Google. Justice Brett Kavanaugh called the Supreme Court’s decision striking down Trump’s emergency tariffs "illogical" in a fiery dissent ...

Donald Trump faces Supreme Court setback on tariff authority in Learning Services ruling, but strategic use of remaining trade powers could help America.

After the US Supreme Court ruled against President Trump’s import tariff measures, his first reaction (after harshly ...

Tariffs can play multiple roles: they have traditionally been used as instruments of trade policy, and the Trump administration has increasingly employed them as foreign policy tools to extract ...

Peter E. Harrell & Jennifer Hillman (Lawfare) had an interesting post yesterday, "Unexpected Questions in Learning Resources v. Trump," with the subtitle "Are IEEPA tariffs permitted as either a ...

Justice Brett Kavanaugh called the Supreme Court’s decision striking down Trump’s emergency tariffs "illogical" in a fiery dissent on Friday and offered a roadmap of alternatives Trump could use to ...

Justice Brett Kavanaugh called the Supreme Court’s decision striking down Trump’s emergency tariffs "illogical" in a fiery dissent on Friday and offered a roadmap of alternatives for Trump to attempt ...