In Trump v. CASA, the Supreme Court significantly narrowed federal courts’ power to issue “universal” or “nationwide” injunctions—broad orders that bar the government from enforcing a policy against ...
This is part of SCOTUSblog’s term in review series, in which scholars analyze some of the most significant cases of the 2024-25 Supreme Court term. The court has announced that one narrowly defined ...
How the Supreme Court ruling on nationwide injunctions affects presidential powers The Supreme Court delivered a major decision Friday that limits federal judges’ power to block the president’s agenda ...
On January 23, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court granted the federal government’s request to stay the nationwide injunction issued in the Texas Top Cop Shop case against enforcing the Corporate ...
A journalist runs out of the U.S. Supreme Court building carrying a ruling on the last day of the court's term on June 27, 2025, in Washington, D.C. Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images When presidents have ...
President Donald Trump signs an executive order on birthright citizenship in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, Jan. 20, 2025. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci, File) WASHINGTON (CN) — Immigrant ...
Washington — The Supreme Court on Friday limited the use of nationwide injunctions, reining in federal judges' ability to issue sweeping orders that have in recent years stymied implementation of ...
TOPEKA, Kan. (WIBW) - President Trump’s legal team left the United States Supreme Court without a final decision on his order to end birthright citizenship, but they’re still calling it a major win.
Private Eye editor Ian Hislop once called it a legal "weapon" deployed by the rich and powerful. But now the lifting of a super-injunction that blocked the reporting of the calamitous Afghan data leak ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results